Legal Opinion

Radaker v. Scott

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1993No. 23364PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants Byron C. Radaker and Shirley A. Radaker (collectively “Radaker”) purchased a house in Incline Village which was built pursuant to an agreement between respondents Louis E. Scott, Phyllis Scott (collectively “Scott”) and Dan Tonnemacher. Several months after Radaker purchased the house, various structural defects were discovered. Thereafter, Radaker commenced this action to recover costs based upon, inter alia, breach of implied warranty of habitability and misrepresentation. The district court determined that a joint venture existed between Scott and Tonnemacher and that the…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Martin v. Chapel, Wilkinson, Riggs, and AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dewey v. Redevelopment Agency of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. J.D. Construction, Inc. v. IBEX International Group, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Waterfall Homeowners Ass'n v. Viega, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API