Legal Opinion

Export Boxing & Crating Inc. v. Tech Met

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided March 6, 2003No. GD98-11345 and 1696 WDA 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, J.,

SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION

By this supplement to opinion, the court recognizes the decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Trach v. Fellin, no. 1921 EDA 2000; 1949 EDA 2000; 2003 WL 282804 (Pa. Super. February 11, 2003) (en banc) (plurality opinion), which was filed one day prior to the date this court filed its opinion in the above-captioned *47case. In Trach, the Superior Court re-evaluated the circumstances for application of the Frye test. The Trach opinion does not alter this court’s determination that the testimony of Ralph J. Bartlett was admissible. However, this court…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API