Legal Opinion

Roll v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Marion Civil Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

The complaint in this case states the following substantial facts:

*548That the appellants are partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Roll & Morris; that they are, and for the year last past have been, in the possession, under a lease from Isaac H. Roll, of lot No. 2, in square No. 67, in the city of Indianapolis, on which is situated a certain building, containing a well-finished basement story, which lot and building abuts on South Illinois street, and has been occupied by the plaintiffs for the year last past as a storeroom, in which they carry on a wholesale and retail…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Mayor of New YorkCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Mills v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Barton v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Brinkmeyer v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Emery v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Gas-Light & Coke Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Clark, Trustee, Etc. v. . FosdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API