Legal Opinion

Colasanti v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 19, 2025No. 3:19-cv-00443Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION LOU COLASANTI, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-cv-00443-YY v. OPINION AND ORDER CITY OF PORTLAND and STATE OF OREGON, Defendants. Following a jury verdict in favor of defendant City of Portland on plaintiff’s claims of disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and O.R.S. 659A.112, the court held a bench trial on plaintiff’s remaining equitable claim of ADA interference against the City and the State of Oregon. This Opinion and Order comprises the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Brenda Brown v. City of Tucson, a Municipal Corporation of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Peter W. Coons v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, (Internal Revenue Service)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API