Legal Opinion

Young v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 18, 1984No. 55,021PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

Plaintiff-appellant Connie S. Young and intervenor-cross-appellant Joe D. Newman both appeal from the trial court’s denial of their conflicting claims to decedent’s corporate stock in the Credit Bureau of Liberal, Inc. The trial court found their claims to be barred by the nonclaim statute, K.S.A. 59-2239.

The facts, though complex, are not in dispute. The decedent, Frank J. Keefer, acquired all of the 6000 shares of stock in the Credit Bureau on September 23, 1974. He immediately sold 667 shares to plaintiff Connie Sue Young. The corporation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Gustafson v. BowlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Bourke v. BourkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Gantz v. BondurantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. In Re Estate of BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WolfSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. In Re the Estate of BrennerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  3. In Re the Estate of BrennerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API