Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Bowling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1944No. 36,051; No. 36,063PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

The appeals in cases No. 36,051 and No. 36,063 present the same general questions and have been consolidated by agreement of the parties. The principal question presented is whether an appeal may be taken by an opponent of a will from an order admitting a will to probate when the opponent had proper notice of the hearing for probate and made no objection thereto.

The question arises out of the overruling of the separate demurrers of Willard J. Breidenthal, executor of the will of Ida E. Grindrod, deceased, and May Bowling, residuary legatee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Egnatic ex rel. Egnatic v. WollardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Foss v. WilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Reed v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Yeager v. YeagerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Burns v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Clutter v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Bourke v. BourkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Estate of Johnson v. BasslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Gantz v. BondurantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Mossman v. HAW'N TR. CO., LIMITEDHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API