Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Learning Services Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 2007No. COA07-98PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In general, statutory immunity is “available to [a defendant] if he satisfies all of the [statutory] requirements.” 1 Here, the defendants claim qualified immunity under North Carolina General Statutes § 122C-210.1, which is available for one “who follows accepted professional judgment, practice, and standards.” 2 Because we find that a question of fact remains as to whether the defendants followed accepted professional judgment, practices, and standards, we conclude that they are not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law.

Sometime after dark on 31 January 2004, Timothy…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Free Spirit Aviation, Inc. v. Rutherford Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Fraley v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Allmond v. GoodnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Boryla-Lett v. Psychiatric Solutions of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Butterfield v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API