Snyder v. Learning Services Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
In general, statutory immunity is “available to [a defendant] if he satisfies all of the [statutory] requirements.” 1 Here, the defendants claim qualified immunity under North Carolina General Statutes § 122C-210.1, which is available for one “who follows accepted professional judgment, practice, and standards.” 2 Because we find that a question of fact remains as to whether the defendants followed accepted professional judgment, practices, and standards, we conclude that they are not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law.
Sometime after dark on 31 January 2004, Timothy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Free Spirit Aviation, Inc. v. Rutherford Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Fraley v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Allmond v. GoodnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Boryla-Lett v. Psychiatric Solutions of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Butterfield v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.