Legal Opinion

Rose v. . Dean

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s wife. The defendant offered no evidence, and at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony moved to dismiss the action as in case of nonsuit. Upon denial of the motion issues were submitted to the jury and upon the verdict judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant’s motion in our opinion should have been allowed.

The basis of the action is the husband’s loss of the society, affection, and assistance of his wife, and if there is no element of seduction or adultery malice must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cottle v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Hartpence v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Mead v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Backman v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Mercer v. ParsonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Hankins v. . HankinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Barker v. DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Bishop v. GlazenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Barker v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API