Legal Opinion
State v. Beeman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 21, 1975No. 1 CA-CR 1048PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Presiding Judge.
Defendant/appellant Harold Beeman was found guilty on December 31, 1974, of driving a motorcycle without a helmet in violation of § 28-964A, Arizona. Revised Statutes, Laws 1973. The pertinent part of this statute reads in part:
“A. The operator and passenger of a motorcycle or motor-driven cycle shall at all times, while operating or riding on such motorcycle or motor-driven cycle, wear a protective helmet on his head in an appropriate manner safely secured. The operator and passenger of a motorcycle or motor-driven cycle shall also wear protective glasses,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rose v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Simon v. SargentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1972
- State v. AlsoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Benning v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- People v. KohrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Buhl v. HanniganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. KohrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.