In re Stincic
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Catherine J. Furay, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
This case is before the Court on the Motion of Johnson Bank for Relief from Stay. The Debtor, Nicholas Stincic (“Stin-cic”), claims the mortgage at issue was rescinded and, thus, there is no entitlement to relief from stay.
*893I. Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(a) and 157(a). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(G) and (L). See In re Bates, 270 B.R. 455, 459 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2001). This opinion accordingly contains the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
II…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Marietta Taylor v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Waterfield Mortgage Company, and Burke, Costanza & Cuppy, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Kevin Harold v. Christopher SteelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Judy Kratville v. Marvin T. Runyon, United States Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re HueramoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017