Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Brimberg Bros. v. Globe Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 7, 1928No. 113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The writ raises two points: May the relators sue upon the bond? If so, does it cover a loss occurring before the date of its execution? The first question depends upon whether the bond was given for the benefit of the United States alone or of the owners of carted merchandise as well. In Howard v. U. S., 184 U. S. 676, 22 S. Ct. 543, 46 L. Ed. 754, the Supreme Court held that a court clerk’s bond was available to suitors as well as to the United States, and allowed recovery in an aetion by an injured party in the name of the United States. In United States v. Abeel, 174…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fosmire v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Howard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. National Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Supreme Council Catholic Knights v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  5. United States v. AbeelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Midland Loan Finance Co. v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States ex rel. Midland Loan Finance Co. v. National Surety Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
  3. United States v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API