Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Wade

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1953No. 7 Div. 171PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Plaintiff Lusk sued defendants Wade and Mitchell for false imprisonment and assault and battery. Trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendants and plaintiff has appealed.

The appellant’s brief begins its argument upon alleged errors in the court’s oral charge. The oral charge, although made a part of the record by statute, will not be reviewed unless an exception was duly reserved. Title 7, § 827(1), Code 1940, Vol. 2, Pocket Part; Guy v. Lancaster, 250 Ala. 287, 34 So.2d 499; Carithers v. Commercial Credit Corp., 33 Ala.App. 472, 34 So.2d 505; Anderson v. State, 209…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ashford v. AshfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Snellings v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Reese v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Salter v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Boles v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Associates Capital Corp. v. Bank of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Matthews v. MaynardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API