Lusk v. Wade
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Plaintiff Lusk sued defendants Wade and Mitchell for false imprisonment and assault and battery. Trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendants and plaintiff has appealed.
The appellant’s brief begins its argument upon alleged errors in the court’s oral charge. The oral charge, although made a part of the record by statute, will not be reviewed unless an exception was duly reserved. Title 7, § 827(1), Code 1940, Vol. 2, Pocket Part; Guy v. Lancaster, 250 Ala. 287, 34 So.2d 499; Carithers v. Commercial Credit Corp., 33 Ala.App. 472, 34 So.2d 505; Anderson v. State, 209…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ashford v. AshfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Snellings v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Guy v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Reese v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Salter v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Boles v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Associates Capital Corp. v. Bank of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Matthews v. MaynardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.