Matthews v. Maynard
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
Appeal by defendant from judgment rendered on jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in suit to recover personal injury and property damages growing out of an automobile collision in the City of Birmingham. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled.
There are three assignments of error. The only one argued and insisted on charges error in “overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.” The only ground of the motion relied on is as follows:
“21. For that the Court erred in orally instructing the jury as to the interpretation of the Rule of the Road contained in Title 36,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. TapiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Beasley-Bennett Electric Co. v. Gulf Coast Chapter of National Electrical Contractors Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Hornaday v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Grimes v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jones v. Americar, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Sanders v. ScarveySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Alabama Power Company v. ScholzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Allred v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- General Finance Corporation v. BradwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.