Legal Opinion
Maik v. Massapequa Library Board of Trustees
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaul J. Widlitz, J.
This is a petition to amend a notice of claim nunc pro tunc to include the Massapequa Library Board of Trustees within a notice served on the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 23, and to allow service to be made on the library trustees.
The claimant was injured on July 17, 1964 when an electric shock passed through his body while he was performing work in the construction of a library building in Massapequa. A notice of claim was timely served on the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 23, and the petitioner’s attorney was subsequently served with a notice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ringgold v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Coyle v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Seyer v. SchoenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bovich v. East Meadow Public LibraryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Dow v. Board of Trustees of Farmingdale Public LibraryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Martin v. Town of EsopusNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Donnelly v. McLellanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1995