Ringgold v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order granting the motion of the infant claimant and her guardian for leave to file their claim against the New York City Transit Authority after the expiration of the ninety-day period provided by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. Through inadvertence the notice properly asserting the claim against the authority was mailed to and received by the comptroller of the City of New York instead of the authority. No notice of claim was received by the authority within the statutory period.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Munroe v. BoothNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Nori v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Schnee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Coyle v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by13 opinions
- Evans v. Howard R. Green Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Glasheen v. ValeraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Maik v. Massapequa Library Board of TrusteesNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Negrone v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.