Legal Opinion

Martin v. Town of Esopus

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.

In this action to recover for property damages allegedly resulting from negligence on the part of defendants, a motion is made to dismiss the complaint as against defendant Port Ewen Water District “ upon the ground that said complaint fails to state a cause of action.” The complaint alleges: “ That notices of the plaintiff’s claim and his intention to sue, and of the time when and the place where the damages alleged herein were incurred and sustained, were duly served by the plaintiff upon the defendants on or about the 26th day of May, 1967 ”; but the gist of movant’s contention, as stated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jayne v. East Hills Water DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Harrigan v. Town of SmithtownNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Maik v. Massapequa Library Board of TrusteesNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fraccola v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Donnelly v. McLellanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1995
  3. City of Gallup v. New Mexico State Park & Recreation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Covanta Niagara, L.P. v. Town of Amherst Garbage & Refuse District No. 1New York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API