Legal Opinion
Dow-Arneson Co. v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1934No. 29,588PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORING, Justice.
This case arose out of transactions connected with the widening of Third street in St. Paul. Lot one, auditor’s subdivision No. 35, Ramsey county, was acquired by the city in condemnation proceedings. October 20, 1927, after the proceedings were started, the owner leased to plaintiff a part of the second floor of the building located on lot one. The lease provided in part:
“It is understood and agreed between the parties that said property is subject to condemnation proceedings by the city of St. Paul in connection with the widening and improvement of East Third street, and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burns v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Wentworth v. RiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Gates v. PowellMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Browder v. PhinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Shea v. Inhabitants of MilfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Steller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Ramette v. Digital River, Inc. (In Re Graphics Technology, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.