Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1992No. 459PA91PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

On discretionary review before this Court, the State first argues that it met its burden of proof at trial as to all essential elements of the crime of second-degree sexual offense. The Court of Appeals concluded that no substantial evidence was introduced at trial to support a reasonable finding that the defendant in the present case used force in the commission of the offense charged. For that reason, the Court of Appeals concluded that the defendant was entitled to his liberty and reversed the trial court’s judgment without reaching the defendant’s remaining assignments…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Alvin James PierceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  2. State v. HaserMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. In re J.U.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API