Legal Opinion

Simmesport State Bank v. Scallan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1961No. 451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRUGÉ, Judge.

Plaintiff-respondent, the Simmesport State Bank, sought to compel relators, Man-sura State Bank and Anne Scalian Laborde, to appear and produce certain documents under a subpoena and a subpoena duces tecum on an examination of a judgment debtor. Orders were signed by the Court and these subpoenas were issued. Motions were filed to quash the subpoenas. The trial court overruled the motions and ordered the applicants to comply therewith. We granted relators’ application for writs of certiorari to review this ruling.

The pertinent facts are that in a civil suit entitled “Simmesport…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Collector of Revenue v. OlveySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  3. Texas Company v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. Harris v. BurgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parish Nat. Bank v. LaneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Beckham v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Aultman v. Entergy Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Casey v. CaseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Dunn & Bradstreet, Inc. v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API