Legal Opinion
Archer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1959No. 6014PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
The question is whether the appellants, who claim ownership of an unpatented mining claim1 located on land involved *689in a quiet title suit brought by the United States, may intervene in that action.
The land was part of a school land grant to Utah. Upon survey it was found to be within a reservation set apart for the Navajo Tribe of Indians. When, prior to survey, granted land was included within an Indian reservation, the state was permitted to select other land in lieu thereof.2 3 Utah by statute provided that mineral deposits on state lands were reserved from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Earl Martin and De Berard Cattle CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- MacDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
- Tooele County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- W. W. Degge, Louise Degge, Guy G. Goyer, Madeleine Goyer, Howard F. Manning and Margaret J. Manning v. City of Boulder, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Bonnet v. Trustees of Schools of Township 41 NorthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Charles Goodpaster v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company, John H. Burke v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.