Legal Opinion

Nance v. Stuart

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1898No. 1672PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

For the second time this case is before the court. It came up on appeal originally from a judgment rendered in favor of the relator Stuart. This was reversed. He obtained another judgment directing a peremptory writ of mandamus to issue. The state again appears and re-presents the case. The imperfect condition of the record on the original appeal which is reported in the 7 Colo. App. 510, under the title of Nanee v. Stuart, did not permit us to decide the question at issue between the parties, and when the case was sent back it was with directions to the court below to give the parties leave…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Appropriations by General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. In re Continuing AppropriationsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Parks v. Commissioners of Soldiers' & Sailors' HomeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Collier & Cleveland Lithographing Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  5. Institute for the Education of the Mute & Blind v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lenhart v. HannaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Post Printing & Publishing Co. v. ShafrothSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Stuart v. NanceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Lowell v. BonneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Lowell v. BonneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API