Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Nance
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 15, 1900No. 3964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from the Court of Appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Ohiep Justice Campbell
delivered the opinion of the court.
This mandamus proceeding, begun in the district court of Arapahoe county, was to compel the state treasurer to pay a state warrant. The judgment was in favor of petitioner, which, on an appeal to the court of appeals by the state treasurer, was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Nance v. Stuart, 7 Colo. App. 510.
Upon a second trial judgment was again rendered against the public officer, and upon his second appeal in the court of appeals, the judgment was also reversed. Nance v. Stuart, 12 Colo. App. 125.
The petitioner then…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Appropriations by General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Parks v. Commissioners of Soldiers' & Sailors' HomeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- Henderson v. People ex rel. WingateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Goodykoontz v. People ex rel. SawyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Nance v. People ex rel. SheedySupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Post Printing & Publishing Co. v. ShafrothSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912