Legal Opinion
CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC. v. King
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 2009No. 06-AA-1003Published
1Opinion of the Court
977 A.2d 928 (2009)
CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., Petitioner,
v.
Patricia O. KING, Respondent.
No. 06-AA-1003.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
July 30, 2009.
BEFORE: WASHINGTON*, Chief Judge; RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, KRAMER, FISHER*, BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, THOMPSON, and OBERLY, Associate Judges; KING*, Senior Judge.
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and petitioner's consent motion for leave to file the lodged response, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged response to the petition. It is
FURTHER…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of LaborDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bublis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chimes District of Columbia, Inc. v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC. v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009