Legal Opinion

CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC. v. King

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 2009No. 06-AA-1003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of respondent’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and petitioner’s consent motion for leave to file the lodged response, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged response to the petition. It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Senior Judge KING would grant the petition for rehearing.

A…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC. v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API