Legal Opinion

(PC) Singh v. CDCR

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 13, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01624Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BALJIT SINGH, No. 2:23-cv-01624-DC-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The court found that plaintiff’s original complaint stated one potentially 19 cognizable claim (against defendant Bradley for violation of the Eighth Amendment) and 20 dismissed the remaining claims with leave to amend. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has filed an amended 21 complaint, a request for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API