Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Perisian

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1957No. 37,413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This matter is before us on motion to dismiss an appeal taken by the defendant Leo Perisian from an order of the District Court of Wadena County dated July 18, 1957. The order was made pursuant to the plaintiff’s motion for a dismissal without prejudice in an action in tort for negligence under Rule 41.01(2) of Rules of Civil Pro cedure, which provides that an action may be dismissed on order of the court “upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper.” Here, the court dismissed the action without prejudice and without imposing any conditions.

It is the contention of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. H. Christiansen & Sons, Inc. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Luethi v. StankoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Winnifred Hillerns v. Minnesotan Hotel and OthersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Sussman v. SussmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API