People v. Saulters
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Even assuming, arguendo, that County Court erred in determining that the photo array was not unduly suggestive, the court properly allowed two complainants to make in-court identifications of defendant because the evidence sufficiently established an independent basis for their in-court identifications (see, People v South, 233 AD2d 910, 911, lv denied 89 NY2d 989). We reject the contention of defendant that he was improperly excluded from sidebar conferences with prospective jurors on matters of bias or prejudice. The record establishes that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrathwaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. OkaforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Amaro v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. SumpterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. MejiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. SellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.