Legal Opinion

Wickhizer v. Bolin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1899No. 2,453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

— This action was commenced by appellee as plaintiff in the lower court. The complaint was in two *2paragraphs, the first paragraph of which is upon a promissory note, the second upon a bill of sale. Appellants’ answer consists of four paragraphs; the first, a general denial; the second, a plea of non est factum, addressed to the first paragraph of the complaint; the third paragraph of answer avers the facts connected with the whole transaction, and is addressed to both paragraphs of complaint; the fourth is an answer of non est factum, addressed to the second paragraph of complaint. A demurrer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Vaughan v. GodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Fitzgerald v. GoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Buchanan v. Logansport, Crawfordsville & Southwestern R. W. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Lange v. DammierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Garmo v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Estate of Williams, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API