De Garmo v. Kay
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. H. M. Stephens, Judge. Action by G. C. De Garmo against W. 0. Kay and another. Judgment for defendants after trial without jury, and order denying new trial. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.
'This was an action brought by plaintiff against the defendants to recover an amount alleged to be due and owing on a promissory note. The complaint was in the usual form, alleging execution and delivery by the defendants for a valuable consideration of a note for $5,000, payable six months after date, with interest at five per cent, per annum from date until *232paid, and an attorney’s fee in case of suit, to one Marshall E. Pope, who, for a valuable consideration, by indorsement “without recourse,” passed the same to the plaintiff, the present holder and owner thereof. The answer admitted the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tovera v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Thornhill v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Union Trust Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Wickhizer v. BolinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899