Legal Opinion
206-208 Main Street Associates Inc. v. Arch Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered April 26, 2012, which, upon plaintiffs and defendant H&H Builders’ motions for summary judgment, declared that defendant Arch Insurance Company has a duty to defend and indemnify H&H and plaintiff, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motions denied, and the declaration vacated.
*404Plaintiff, 206-208 Main Street Associates, Inc. doing business as 8930 Sutphin Blvd., LLC (Sutphin), owned the property at 206-208 Main Street in Queens, New York. Sutphin hired defendant H&H Builders, Inc. (H&H) to act as construction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- O'Dowd v. American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Twin City Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- William M. Moore Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.