Legal Opinion

United States v. Unit No. 7 & No. 8

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1988No. Nos. 87-2499, 87-2500, 87-2501 and 87-2502SIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition for rehearing en bane has been filed; we defer ruling on said petition for rehearing en banc and stay the issuance of mandate deferring further order pending decisions by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Monsanto, 836 F.2d 74 (2d Cir.1987), rev’d & remanded on other grounds, 852 F.2d 1400 (2d Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 353, 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988), and United States v. Harvey, 814 F.2d 905 (4th Cir.1987), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. In Re Caplin & Drysdale, 837 F.2d 637 (4th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. BissellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. ML-CFC 2007-6 Puerto Rico v. BPP Retail Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  4. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
  5. United States v. Unit No. 7 & Unit No. 8 of Shop in the Grove CondominiumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API