SHEILA A. v. Finney
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbott, J.:
Plaintiffs’ action challenges the adequacy of the State’s Child in Need of Care program. The Governor of the State of Kansas is one of several named defendants. The trial court dismissed the Governor as a defendant because it believed it could not grant the relief sought by plaintiffs against the Governor. Plaintiffs appeal from the order dismissing the Governor.
After the appeal was docketed, plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement with the remaining defendant. Thus, we are first faced with the issue of whether this appeal is now moot…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Unified School District No. 503 v. McKinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- National Education Ass'n-Topeka, Inc. v. U.S.D. 501Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Cities of Oberlin v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Morrison v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Shipe v. Public Wholesale Water Supply District No. 25Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. RoatSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- In Re the Estate of SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Moran v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.