Legal Opinion

H.R. v. Department of Public Welfare

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

H.R. and R.R. (collectively, Petitioners) appeal from a “Pre-Hearing Opinion on Interlocutory Matter,” in which an attorney examiner (examiner) of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW), Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), held that: (1) the Susquehanna County Services for Children and Youth (SCSCY) and OHA have subject matter jurisdiction over Petitioners’ expungement proceeding; and (2) OHA should not decline jurisdiction based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

H.R. is the biological mother of two children, M.W., bom November 11, 1987, and T.W., bom November 6,1985.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. LeFlar v. Gulf Creek Indus. Park No. 2Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Martino v. TRANSPORT WRKERS'UN. OF PHIL.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Alford v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re Estate of IsraelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Techtmann v. HowieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Scholastic Services Organization, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Peterson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Adams v. Department of HealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API