Legal Opinion

Martino v. TRANSPORT WRKERS'UN. OF PHIL.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1984No. 89 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1982PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals by allowance an order of Superior Court1 affirming Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas’ denial of SEPTA’s preliminary objections challenging its jurisdiction to hear and decide the case.2 We affirm.

*394I.

The sole question for our consideration is whether a public employee is totally precluded from obtaining any relief directly or indirectly, involving his public employer, for discharge in arguable breach of a collective bargaining agreement when the union has violated its duty of fair…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Casner v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Kozura v. Tulpehocken Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Runski v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 2500Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API