Legal Opinion

Bowley v. Duca

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

The defendant claims that the plaintiff and her husband were engaged in a joint enterprise in operating his automobile. The situation is the same as that presented in Collins v. Hustis, 79 N. H. 446. In that case the occupants of the car were an engaged couple, who were riding for pleasure. Miss Collins was treated as O’Brien’s passenger, and while no claim was made that his negligence was imputable to her, the decision that there could be a recovery for her death, but not for his, rests upon the assumption that his negligence was not to be imputed to her. Although the case is not to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wentworth v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  2. Beaucage v. MercerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fehely v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Derosier v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Newell Contracting Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
  5. Loomis v. AbelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API