Legal Opinion

United States v. Unterman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 28, 1976No. 76 Cr. 201PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.

Deficiencies in the conduct of some defense counsel on the day of sentence can so acutely interfere with the functions of the sentence that they should not be received with amiable toleration. This is so in all cases — the hardened offender, the recidivist, the first offender and youth. The misapprehension of counsel in this regard often seems to be based upon a want of understanding rather than upon any conscious purpose. Clearly unprepared at sentence, they denounce, as they may, the court, its agencies and the community, and do so in such fashion as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re J. P. Linahan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. OchsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. United States v. UntermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. McClain v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. United States v. PoynterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  5. Ferguson v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API