McClain v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
In this pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, we are confronted with the issue of the retroactivity of important changes in the law of prosecuting and sentencing persons who commit armed bank robbery. In Simpson v. United States, 435 U.S. 6, 98 S.Ct. 909, 55 L.Ed.2d 70 (1978), the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant may not be sentenced under both 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d) 1 (armed bank robbery) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 2 (use of a firearm to commit a felony). In Grimes v. United States, 607 F.2d 6, No. 79-2007 (2d Cir. Sept. 6, 1979), the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Marvin McClain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. MakresDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Richard Bullock Henry, A/K/A Imari Abubakari Obadele, United States of America v. Wayne James, A/K/A Offoga Quaddus, and Thomas Norman, A/K/A Hekima AnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983