Legal Opinion

State v. Horan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1884PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after conviction upon an indictment for robbery. The case is stated in the opinion. The court erred in admitting -evidence of the statements made by the prosecuting witness.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after conviction upon an indictment for robbery. The case is stated in the opinion. The court erred in admitting -evidence of the statements made by the prosecuting witness. Johnson v. State, 17 Ala. 618; Hall v. State, 40 Ala. 698; Steele v. State, 61 Ala. 213; People v. McCrea, 32 Cal. 98; Enos v. Tuttle, 3 Conn. 247; Russell v. Frisbie, 19 Conn. 205; Ford v. Haskell, 32 Conn. 489; Rockwell v. Taylor, 41 Conn. 55; State v. Seymour, 1 Houst. Cr. C. 508; Carter v.…

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The defendants were tried and convicted of the-crime of robbery, in the district court of Ramsey county. The most material question of fact arising on the trial was the identification of the defendants by the prosecuting witness. It appeared from his testimony that, while returning to his home on John street, in St. Paul, at about 10 o’clock in the evening, he was assaulted and robbed by two men, strangers to him, whom he had observed standing on the side of the street in advance of him. It was a bright night and the street lamps were also burning, and his house was in sight nearby. Before he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. People of the State of N.Y. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Harriman v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Driscoll v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People v. VernonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Keyser v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Lambrecht v. SchreyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API