Legal Opinion
Potter v. Potter
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions
From Wasco: W. L. Bradshaw, Judge. Suit by Eleanor Potter against M. P. Potter for the specific performance of a contract to execute certain conveyances. Decree for plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
This is a suit to enforce the specific performance of the following agreement:
“ For and in consideration of one dollar to me paid, and for the purpose of effecting an immediate sale and settlement, I, M. B. Potter, do hereby agree that on the payment to me of five thousand .dollars ($5,000.00) in casia, on or before the 14th day of September, 1901, to transfer by usual warranty deed my unencumbered interest in what is known as the Potter Place at Belmont in Hood River, AVasco, Co., Oregon, containing one hundred and forty-five (145) acres, with buildings, etc., to whomsoever my wife Eleanor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnston v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Linton v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- McKee v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Chance v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- In re JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915
- McCrary v. BiggersOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Runyan v. WinstockOregon Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.