Legal Opinion

Runyan v. Winstock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Multnomah: John B. Cleland, Judge. This is an action in ejectment by Mahlon T. Runyan against Jennie Winstock, William McFarland, Samuel McFarland and George McFarland to recover possession of Lot C, Block 1, Cole’s Addition to East Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon. From a judgment in favor of the defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin

This is an action in ejectment, plaintiff alleging that he is the owner of a life estate in Lot C, Block 1, Cole’s Addition to East Portland. Defendants for answer deny plaintiff’s title, and allege that plaintiff and Sarah J. Runyan were husband and wife, and that, at the time of the marriage Sarah J. Runyan was the owner in fee simple of said lot, and subsequently to the marriage she conveyed the same to defendants, and ever since they have been, and now are, the owners in fee simple and entitled to the possession thereof; that said Sarah J. Runyan died prior to the commencement of this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Paulson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Rugh v. OttenheimerOregon Supreme Court · 1877
  3. State v. RandolphOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Tong v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Billings v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1858

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peery v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Chance v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Haberly v. TreadgoldOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hess v. HessOregon Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API