State v. Holden
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
I
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of sexual abuse occurring prior to the incident for which defendant was on trial. Defendant contends that this evidence was admissible under G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 412(b) (1988), which states: “Not*247withstanding any other provision of law, the sexual behavior of the complainant is irrelevant to any issue in the prosecution unless such behavior: ... (2) Is evidence of specific instances of sexual behavior offered for the purpose of showing that the act or acts charged were not committed by the defendant^]”
Defenda…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. DeanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. WagonerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.