Legal Opinion

State v. Caulley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1999No. 98AP-74PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lazarus, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Robert J. Caulley, appeals the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his motions for appointment of appellate counsel and preparation of a trial transcript at state expense. We find that the trial court abused its discretion in applying the standard for determining whether a criminal defendant is entitled to court-appointed counsel as set forth in State v. Tymcio, (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 39, 71 O.O.2d 22, 325 N.E.2d 556. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and find that appellant is entitled to appointed appellate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. TymcioOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MansfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. Cham, Unpublished Decision (1-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API