Legal Opinion

Rock v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1986No. CR 85-215PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steel Hays, Justice.

Appellant was charged with manslaughter for the July 2, 1983 shooting of her husband. She was convicted and sentenced to ten years imprisonment and fined $10,000.

On appeal appellant’s primary argument revolves around a hypnotic session conducted prior to the trial. Appellant could not remember everything about the shooting and without consulting the court nor informing the prosecutor, her attorney hired a psychiatrist to use hypnosis to induce recollection. Before hypnosis was begun, the psychiatrist, Dr. Bettye Back, interviewed appellant for an hour. Included in that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. TuttleUtah Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API