Legal Opinion

Grosz v. Andrus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1977No. 75-3186PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellants are Indian landowners seeking to quiet title to a portion of their trust lands. The suit was brought against the United States and others. The district court dismissed the claims against all of the original defendants. However, before this court, the Indian landowners contest only the dismissal of their claim as it relates to the United States.

This suit arises from a dispute over the ownership of a road running through appellants’ trust lands on the Makah Indian Reservation, Neah Bay, Washington. Appellants, enrolled Makah Indians, contend that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. M. O. S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Hatter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1975
  4. H-10 Water Taxi Company, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Thos. P. Gonzalez Corporation v. Consejo Nacional De Produccion De Costa Rica, and Sergio Quiros MarotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Knapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Park County, Montana, and Sweet Grass County, Montana v. United States of America, Cross Creek Protective Association, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. State of California, Ex Rel., State Land Commission v. Yuba Goldfields, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Glaxo, Inc. And Glaxo Group Limited v. Torpharm, Inc., Apotex Usa, Inc. And Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API