Hastorf v. Hudson River Stone Supply Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The above libel was filed to recover a certain balance of charter hire, and the damages sustained by the. libelant’s scow Alexandria on May 26, 1900, at Kddyville on Rondout creek, while the scow was under charter to the respondent, the Hudson River Stone Supply Company, and while lying at the bulkhead under some elevated bins for holding crushed stone, belonging to the Metropolitan Crushed Stone Company. The latter company has been brought into the action as defendant by petition under the fifty-ninth rule. The bins were 35 feet long and 30 or 40 feet deep and supported…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stewart v. . FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Wolf v. . American Tract SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Flynn v. Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Quinn v. Complete Electric Const. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
- Warn v. Davis Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dailey v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Hastorf v. F. R. Long-W. G. Broadhurst Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Burns Bros. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. McAllister Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Dailey v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.