Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Railroad v. McAllister Bros.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 30, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Libellant, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company (hereinafter called “Pennsylvania”), seeks to recover from the respondent, McAllister Lighterage Line, Inc. (hereinafter called “McAllister”), $20,000 as indemnity which it paid in settlement of an action brought by one Andrew Ceci against both libellant and respondent in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.1 Ceci had received injuries on a barge, the McAllister No. 108, which Pennsylvania had chartered from McAllister, the owner. In his complaint he charged both with negligence in the conduct, operation and…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- Potashnick-Badgett Dredging Incorporated v. WhitfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- B. W. King, Inc. v. Consolidated Iron & Metal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Misener Marine Construction Co. v. Southport Marine, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Tanker Hygrade No. 2, Inc. v. Barge Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.