Legal Opinion

Dailey v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 8, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for salvage. On petition by respondent to bring in new party.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This was a libel in personam against the City of New York for salvage alleged to have been rendered to Scow “D” belonging to the City, by the libellants’ Tug “Mattie.” It appears that the Mattie found the scow adrift in the East River and it is alleged rendered services to her for which the salvage is sought to be recovered. The City alleges by a petition that the scow was cast adrift by the negligence of other parties and asks that process be issued against them and that they be made respondents in the action, under, or by analogy to, the 59th Rule in Admiralty. This is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Tebo v. Mayor of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894
  3. The AlertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1889
  4. Bregaro v. The CenturionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  5. Hastorf v. Hudson River Stone Supply Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
  2. The Canadian FarmerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
  3. The No. K 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  4. Lauro v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API