Legal Opinion
Zuckerman v. Ruden, Barnett, McCloskey
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 13, 1996No. 95-1597PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
670 So.2d 1050 (1996)
Herman ZUCKERMAN, Appellant,
v.
RUDEN, BARNETT, McCLOSKEY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A., Appellee.
No. 95-1597.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 13, 1996.
Rehearing Denied April 17, 1996.
Silver & Waldman, P.A., and Karl C. Madsen and Glen H. Waldman, Miami, and Edward Licitra, for appellant.
Ruden, McCloskey, Smith, Schuster & Russell, and John H. Pelzer and Jerry P. Brodsky, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
2Per curiam
Appellant, Herman Zuckerman ("Zuckerman"), appeals an adverse summary judgment in his legal malpractice…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Haghayegh v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Bierman v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Adams v. SommersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Spivey v. TraderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
4Cited by7 opinions
- Hold v. ManziniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Taracido v. Perez-Abreu, Zamora & De La Fe, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Kelly v. LodwickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Ramsey v. JonassenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Silvestrone v. EdellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.