Legal Opinion

Burlington Interurban Railway Co. v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1912No. 7000PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Mrror to Denver County Court. — Hon. Clifton R. Bassell, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The suit is to recover $590.35, of which $500.00 is claimed for salary, as an officer and employee of the defendant company, and $90.35 for expenses incident to the discharge of his duties in such employment. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff performed services as second vice-president of the defendant, for which the latter agreed to pay him $125.00 a month and attendant expenses. The defendant answered denying the employment and service. Trial was to the court by consent. Plaintiff had judgment for $300.00, and the defendant brings the case here for review on error.

Upon no theory was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns-Moore Mining & Tunnel Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Hassell Iron Works Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Lenander v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Robeson v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. GleasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Thompson v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Galligan v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. Hollenbeck & Reeves v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  5. Reitler v. OlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API