Legal Opinion

Hollenbeck & Reeves v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 3, 1946No. 15,539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error, a partnership, are hereinafter referred to as Hollenbeck, defendant in error as Peterson, and one John B. Jutten as Jutten.

Jutten brought -replevin against Peterson for possession of a certain cow and her increase consisting of one calf at her side in 1941, one born in 1942 and one in 1943 (while the cause was pending). Peterson answered that two of the calves had long since been sold; alleged that in October, 1941 he bought the cow and her calf from Hollenbeck whom he asked be made a party and that in case of recovery by Jutten he have appropriate judgment against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lenander v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Burlington Interurban Railway Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole v. KyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Hoffman v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Hoff v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API